Pesquisando a violência íntima contra a mulher a partir da etnografia feminista
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18764/2178-2229v31n2.2024.25Palavras-chave:
etnografia feminista, violência íntima, saberes transformadoresResumo
Pesquisar a violência íntima usando a epistemologia e a ontologia feministas é um empreendimento difícil e contencioso tanto para a pesquisadora quanto para os participantes na investigação etnográfica. O tema da violência íntima não é apenas emocional e traumático é repleto de tensões fundamentais para o entendimento sociológico dominante de teoria, método e metodologia. Este artigo tenta explicar as compreensões feministas de ontologia, epistemologia e ética e tornar clara a natureza dessas tensões, na escrita e práxis feministas para além das tradições convencionais da pesquisa científica ocidental. Elabora-se, por meio de ilustrações derivadas de pesquisas sobre violência íntima com mulheres, como pesquisar o tema da violência é um exercício desafiador e gratificante quando se baseia nas experiências vividas e nas compreensões de mulheres com as quais a pesquisadora se identifica. Os resultados são transformadores para a pesquisadora e participantes e contribui para a práxis dos direitos humanos.
Downloads
Referências
ABU‐LUGHOD, Lila. Can there be a feminist ethnography? Women & Performance: Women & Performance: a journal of feminist theory. Volume 5, nº1. 1990, p. 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/07407709008571138.
ADKINS, Lisa. Passing on feminism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, Vol.11, nº 4. 2004, p. 427-444. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506804046813.
ALVESSON, Mats; SKOLDBERG, Kaj. Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage. 2000. 350p.
BARRETT, Michelle; PHILLIPS, Anne (Eds.) Destabilizing theory: contemporary feminist debates.: Stanford: Stanford University Press.1992. 236p.
BURTON, Barbara. Brutality and bureaucracy: Human rights, intimate violence and the role of feminist ethnography. American Anthropological Association. PoLar: Political and Legal Anthropology Review. Vol. 23, nº1 2000. p. 138-147. 2000.
DAVIS, Dána-Ain What is a feminist activist ethnographer to do? American Anthropologist, Vol. 116, nº. 2. 2014. 413–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.12112.
DE BEAUVOIR, Simone. The second sex. Tradução por H.M. Parshley. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 1972 [1949]. 768p.
FOUCAULT, Michel. The Foucault reader. Paul Robinow (Eds) New York: Pantheon Books.1984. 400p.
GHOSH, Sanjukata. Feminist ethnography. In, Nancy A. Naples et. al. (Eds.)The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss765.
HARDING, Sandra. Introduction: Is there a feminist methodology? In Sandra Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. p.1-14. 1988. 208p. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP20024S.
HAWKINS, Darren; HUMES, Melissa Human rights and domestic violence. Political Science Quarterly. Oxford University Press. Vol.117, nº2, p 231-257. 2002. https://www.jstor.org/stable/798182.
HESSE-BIBER, Sharlene Nagy; PIATELLI, Deborah. The feminist practice of holistic reflexivity. In: Sharlene J. Hesse-Biber (Ed.) Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Capitulo 27, 2ª ed. p 557–582. 2012. 792 p. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384740
KRISTEVA, Julia Powers of horror: An essay on abjection. Tradução por Leon S. Roudiez: Columbia University Press. [1941] 2024
LAWLESS, Elaine J. Reciprocal ethnography as feminist and emergent. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 2019. 214 p. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvpb3z54
LINABARY, Jasmine R; CORPLE, Danielle J; Cheryl Cooky. Of wine and whiteboards: Enacting feminist reflexivity in collaborative research. Qualitative Research. Vol. 21, nº 5, p. 719-735. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120946988.
MANJOO, Rashida. Special guest contribution: Violence against women as a barrier to the realization of human rights and the exercise of citizenship, Feminist Review. Vol. 112, p. 11-26. 2016. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44987246.
MASLOW, Abraham H. The farther reaches of human nature. New York: Viking Compass Book Press. 1972. 423p.
Autor. Marital violence: A feminist understanding of violence in intimate relations. Thesis (PhD in Social Science) School of Social Sciences. Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, India. 2005. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/22316. Acesso em: 5 de junho 2024.
MOHANTY, Chandra Talpade. Under western eyes: Feminist Scholarship and colonial discourses. In Chandra Talpade Mohanty; Ann Russo e Lourdes Torres (Eds.) Third world women and the politics of feminism, Capitulos 1, p.51-80. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1991. 352p.
ONG, Aihwa. Colonialism and modernity: Feminist re-presentations of women in non-western societies. In Kum Kum Bhavnani (Ed.) Feminism and race, Capitulo 10. p.108–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2001. 559 p.
SCHROCK, Richelle D. The methodological imperatives of feminist ethnography. Journal of Feminist Scholarship, Vol. 5, nº 5, p. 54-60. 2013. Disponível em: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jfs/vol5/iss5/5. Acesso em: 5 de junho 2024.
SEGAL, Lynne. Why feminism: Gender, Psychology, Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press. 1999. 296p.
SHIPMAN, Marten. The limitations of social research. 4ª Ed. London: Longman. 1988.
SLIFE, Brent D.; WILLIAMS, Richard N. What’s behind the research? Discovering hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 1995. 264p.
SPIVAK, Gayatri Chakravorty. The Spivak reader: Selected works of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Landry Donna e Gerald Maclean (Eds.) New York: Routledge. 1996. 344p.
STACEY, Jackie. Can there be a feminist ethnography? Women's Studies International Forum, Vol.11, nº1, 22-27. 1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(88)90004-0
STACEY, Jackie. Untangling feminist theory. In: In: Richardson, Diane e Robinson, Vitoria (Eds) Introduction to Women's Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Capítulo 3, p. 49-73. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22595-8_3
STANLEY, Liz (Ed). Feminist praxis: Research, theory, and epistemology in feminist sociology. Routledge Library Editions: Feminist Theory. Vol. 13.1990. 282p.
STANLEY, Liz; WISE, Sue. Breaking out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul Books.1983. 210p.
STANLEY, Liz; WISE, Sue. Method, methodology and epistemology in feminist research process. In Feminist praxis: Research, theory, and epistemology in feminist sociology. Routledge Library Editions: Feminist Theory. Vol. 13.1990. 282p.
Sweet, Paige L. Who knows? Reflexivity in feminist standpoint theory and Bourdieu. Gender and Society. Vol. 34, nº 6, p. 922–950. 2020). . Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26967176. Acesso em: 5 de junho 2024.
VISHWESWARAN, Kamala. Defining feminist ethnography. In Kamala Vishweswaran. Fictions of feminist ethnography. Capítulo 2, p. 17–27. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. 1994. 224 p.
VISHWESWARAN, Kamala. Histories of feminist ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 26, nº1 p. 591-621. 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.591
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Cadernos de Pesquisa
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
A Cadernos de Pesquisa está licenciada com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
