David Hume and the need to follow the abstruse philosophy for the discovery of the proper province of human reason

Authors

  • Roni Ederson Krause de Oliveira Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Goiás

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18764/2675-8369v2n2.2024.1

Keywords:

Abstruse philosophy, Moral philosophy, Metaphysics

Abstract

A recurring concern bothers David Hume (1711-1776) throughout his works, mainly in the warnings, prefaces and introductions: the nature of the relationship between academic philosophy and popular philosophy. Even nature imposing that we cannot dedicate ourselves entirely to studies without suffering and getting sick for it, Hume argues that we must insist on the search for truth, no matter how difficult this search is. Thus, wanting to be a man in the midst of all our philosophy is a necessity and not a moral precept. Against the image of the skeptical Hume, defended by many specialists in this philosophy, I defend, in this work, the idea that the predominant notion is not that the appropriate philosophy for humanity resides in a balance between abstruse philosophy and easy philosophy, but that, despite the advantages of easy philosophy, truth can only be found within abstruse philosophy. Thus, there is a prevalence of abstruse philosophy over easy, emphasizing the greater importance that this type of philosophy has for the Scottish philosopher. To this end, texts from different periods of the philosopher's life are approached: A kind of history of my life (1734), the introduction of Book I of the A Treatise of Human Nature (1739), as well as the warning, the opening pages of Book III and the preface to the Abstract (1740). Also discussed in this study is the essay entitled Of Essay-Writing (1742), Section I of the An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding (1748) and the essay Of Commerce (1752).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AINSLIE, Donald C. (2015). Hume's True Scepticism. Oxford University Press UK.

DESCARTES, René; Adam, Ch & Tannery, Paul (1897). Discours de la méthode. In: Oeuvres de Descartes. J. Vrin.

DESCARTES, René; Haldane, Elizabeth Sanderson & Ross, G. R. T. (1911). Philosophical Works Rendered Into English. University Press.

GARRET, Don. Cognition and Commitment in Hume’s Philosophy (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1997).

HARRIS, James A. (2015). Hume: An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge University Press.

HUME, David. (1993). A kind of history of my life. 345-350. In: the Cambridge companion to Hume. Edited by David Fate Norton. Cambridge University Press.

HUME, David. A Treatise of Human Nature (1739-1740), ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge; 2nd edn., ed. P. H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978).

HUME, David. Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary. (rev. edn.) (1741/1777), ed. Eugene F. Miller (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1987).

HUME, David. An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding: A Critical Edition (1748), ed. Tom L. Beauchamp (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000).

MOSSNER, Ernest C. (1954). The Life of David Hume. Oxford University Press UK.

Published

2024-12-24

How to Cite

OLIVEIRA, Roni Ederson Krause de.
David Hume and the need to follow the abstruse philosophy for the discovery of the proper province of human reason
. Barricadas: Revista de Filosofia e Interdisciplinaridade, p. 3–32, 24 Dec. 2024 Disponível em: https://periodicoseletronicos.ufma.br/index.php/barricadas/article/view/21988. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2025.

Issue

Section

Artigos